tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5077773.post102186512735891779..comments2024-03-26T15:22:25.095-06:00Comments on The Earliad: Picard's PromiseEarl J. Woodshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07963936256606285358noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5077773.post-82974945708291870822020-01-24T18:57:23.393-07:002020-01-24T18:57:23.393-07:00I had to think on this - maybe JLP *is* a virgin a...I had to think on this - maybe JLP *is* a virgin after all. <br /><br />There are two "monomyths", as Joseph Campbell would put it. One is the Promethean ideal: the village is doomed, the Hero strikes out on a quest and crosses into a forbidden land. There, he discovers the item that will restore his village and overcomes the obstacle to get the thing. He returns to his own world and saves the village. That's it in brief, there are many iterations but this is the core of the myth.<br /><br />Modern critics of Campbell point out that the monomyth is gender-biased and rooted in Jungian imagery. Absolutely true on both counts. So Kim Hudson, a bright Canadian researcher, came up with the "feminine" version of the monomyth: The Virgin's Promise.<br /><br />The Virgin is a character naive in some ways of the world, perhaps an idealist. The Virgin does not live up to the collective ideals of the village and is cast out into the forbidden land. There she embarks on a quest to discover her true nature. She finds the thing that enables her to fulfill her destiny and brings it back to the village. The village changes its collective ideal and embraces the Virgin. <br /><br />Star Wars is as good an example as any of a Campbell monomyth, and I guess Schitt's Creek might be a good example of a Hudsonian monomyth. I should add that the gender of the hero in any of these monomyths is irrelevant. You can have a female Hero like Ripley or a male Virgin like Picard.<br /><br />JLP obviously quests for whatever the McGuffin is that will solve the problem with the Romulans, robots, etc. If the quest ends up saving the universe, such as in Discovery, then we have a Campbellian ending and unless it's truly great I won't help thinking that the story could have been better. Seeing as Picard the TV series is already set for a second season, I imagine that we will be in for the most standard of story arcs possible. <br /><br />If, by some miracle, Picard's idealism fails to save the universe but instead redeems the sins of the Federation, then we will have a Hudsonian ending and<br /><br />I<br />WILL<br />BE<br />IMPRESSED.Jeff Shylukhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11915415377502782962noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5077773.post-86201410196143831862020-01-23T23:36:09.874-07:002020-01-23T23:36:09.874-07:00I'm surprised you thought First Man was dour a...I'm surprised you thought First Man was dour and Picard was not. I agree that it's kind of fun to revisit the Next Generation characters, but starting a show with genocide is... dour. More sulky Star Trek, yay. <br /><br />And: yet more pages cribbed from the Joseph Campbell playbook. Dream sequences that provide mystical answers! Beings with untapped supernatural powers! We will leave the village and go off into the realm of the jealous god to retrieve the Promethean flame yet again. Or... maybe not? Maybe the writers have read The Virgin's Promise?? Perhaps screenwriting has advanced into the new millennium? Jean-Luc Picard is no virgin. <br /><br />So far there's no Tilly and no mirror universe, so I guess that's a plus. Picard the character is likable. The show will have to go a long way (reuse many more tropes than it already has) to damage his reputation. But he is so old now. Which means we have aged along with him, something it looks like Star Trek wants to address. Maybe that's a good thing? Maybe the show could have been better served going boldly. Of course that's something JLP may no longer be equipped to do. Jeff Shylukhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11915415377502782962noreply@blogger.com